<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fractalizer.ru/frpost_350/warning-mismatch_cnt-is-not-0-on-devmd0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fractalizer.ru/frpost_350/warning-mismatch_cnt-is-not-0-on-devmd0/</link>
	<description>My site, devoted primarily to programming with my portfolio, articles, feelings etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mismatch_cnt is not Zero &#124; Nico&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fractalizer.ru/frpost_350/warning-mismatch_cnt-is-not-0-on-devmd0/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mismatch_cnt is not Zero &#124; Nico&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fractalizer.ru/?p=350#comment-545</guid>
		<description>[...] FractializeR reports in his post that he calmed down, as soon as he read the memory-mapped file explanation. However, I cannot agree to his assessment, because up to that point to where the check run first time, I &#8211; for sure &#8211; did not execute any memory mapped operation (dd should not do so). So there still must be some different explanation for this out there. Thus, the post of Chris Siebenmann brings this unclearity to the core: unless you know from where it comes running the commands above remains risky.     Filed under&#160;Uncategorized  Comment (RSS) &#160;&#124;&#160;&#160;Trackback  &#160;&#124;&#160;&#160;Permalink [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FractializeR reports in his post that he calmed down, as soon as he read the memory-mapped file explanation. However, I cannot agree to his assessment, because up to that point to where the check run first time, I &#8211; for sure &#8211; did not execute any memory mapped operation (dd should not do so). So there still must be some different explanation for this out there. Thus, the post of Chris Siebenmann brings this unclearity to the core: unless you know from where it comes running the commands above remains risky.     Filed under&nbsp;Uncategorized  Comment (RSS) &nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;Trackback  &nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;Permalink [...]</f</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
